On Improving Size and Leverage Adjustment Methods for Equity Volatilities
Although in practice equity volatility remains one of the most significant value drivers for many earnout and derivative valuations, equity allocation analyses, and liquidity discount assessments, awareness regarding appropriate methods and techniques for adjusting volatility is still lacking in the industry. The paucity of available academic literature on the topic is confusing and comes with inappropriate guidance from industry publications. Size and leverage methodologies for adjusting equity volatility—presented in a Business Valuation Review article published in 2024 by Covrig, Travers, and Harms—are examined here. A size-adjustment method developed by this author fifteen years ago is compared with the size-adjustment method of Covrig and colleagues. Leverage adjustments and problems associated with various methodologies suggested in industry publications when adjusting volatility for size are discussed.
Median 5-year equity volatilities by size decile and quarter from 1998 through 2017
Relationship of Leverage to Equity and Asset Volatilities
The expected relationship between leverage and equity volatility
Contributor Notes
James Herr is a Senior Director with Alvarez & Marsal Valuation Services in Houston, Texas. Mr. Herr has provided valuation and financial modeling consulting services for more than 25 years. During that time, he has performed close to 1,000 valuation engagements. Before joining Alvarez & Marsal Valuation Services, Mr. Herr was formerly with PwC, KPMG, and BDO. Mr. Herr earned his Bachelor of Arts degree (graduating Magna Cum Laude) in economics and Russian from Brigham Young University, his Master of Arts degree in economics from the University of California at Berkeley, and a Master of Business Administration degree from California State University at East Bay. He is a CFA charterholder, an ASA with the American Society of Appraisers, and a CPA in the state of Texas; Mr. Herr also holds the ABV credential